2002 Chrysler Concorde vs 2002 Ford Taurus
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2002 Chrysler Concorde | 2002 Ford Taurus |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 65 | 1,426 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 75 | 96 |
| Investigations | 1 | 4 |
| Crash reports | 4 | 75 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 11 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 19–21 | 19–21 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 55,000 mi | 81,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chrysler Concorde | Ford Taurus |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 3 | 962 |
| Visibility | 2 | 98 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 1 | 76 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 23 | 53 |
| Structure | 2 | 54 |
| Air Bags | 6 | 47 |
| Electrical System | 6 | 42 |
| Power Train | 6 | 39 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 8 | 57 |
| Rust / corrosion | 0 | 71 |
| Water leaks | 0 | 43 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 22 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 19 |
| Vibration / shaking | 0 | 18 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 6 |
2002 Chrysler Concorde
2002 Ford Taurus
Compare all Chrysler Concorde vs Ford Taurus years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.