2016 Cadillac SRX vs 2016 Volvo XC90
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2016 Cadillac SRX | 2016 Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 168 | 196 |
| Recall campaigns | 2 | 8 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 1,154 | 721 |
| Investigations | 0 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 11 | 5 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 10 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–19 | 22–25 |
| Median reported mileage | 47,500 mi | 25,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Cadillac SRX | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Exterior Lighting | 98 | 2 |
| Engine | 4 | 85 |
| Electrical System | 15 | 56 |
| Structure | 3 | 23 |
| Service Brakes | 6 | 14 |
| Suspension | 16 | 1 |
| Air Bags | 7 | 8 |
| Power Train | 5 | 10 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 5 | 7 |
| Oil consumption | 0 | 30 |
| Loss of power | 0 | 9 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 8 |
| Overheating | 0 | 7 |
| Electrical failures | 0 | 6 |
2016 Cadillac SRX
2016 Volvo XC90
Compare all Cadillac SRX vs Volvo XC90 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.