2012 Subaru Forester vs 2012 Toyota Sequoia
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2012 Subaru Forester | 2012 Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 105 | 20 |
| Recall campaigns | 15 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 379 | 322 |
| Investigations | 0 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 15 | 0 |
| Fire reports | 5 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 21–23 | 14–16 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 48,000 mi | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Subaru Forester | Toyota Sequoia |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 27 | 3 |
| Air Bags | 20 | 0 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 18 | 2 |
| Service Brakes | 11 | 6 |
| Electrical System | 10 | 5 |
| Fuel/propulsion System | 6 | 3 |
| Structure | 5 | 3 |
| Electronic Stability Control (esc) | 4 | 4 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Check engine light | 9 | 0 |
| Oil consumption | 9 | 0 |
| Stalling | 7 | 0 |
2012 Subaru Forester
2012 Toyota Sequoia
Compare all Subaru Forester vs Toyota Sequoia years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.