2005 Subaru Forester vs 2005 Volvo XC90
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2005 Subaru Forester | 2005 Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 93 | 223 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 6 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 136 | 219 |
| Investigations | 1 | 4 |
| Crash reports | 15 | 1 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 3 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 19–23 | 15–18 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 80,000 mi | 86,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Subaru Forester | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 5 | 62 |
| Electrical System | 3 | 51 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 7 | 40 |
| Fuel/propulsion System | 14 | 22 |
| Engine | 3 | 29 |
| Exterior Lighting | 0 | 25 |
| Suspension | 21 | 2 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 17 | 4 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 16 | 12 |
| Hesitation / surging | 6 | 0 |
| Stalling | 0 | 31 |
| Loss of power | 0 | 15 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 14 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 5 |
2005 Subaru Forester
2005 Volvo XC90
Compare all Subaru Forester vs Volvo XC90 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.