2000 Mazda 626 vs 2002 Mazda 626
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Mazda 626 | 2002 Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 217 | 87 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 101 | 98 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 6 | 6 |
| Fire reports | 0 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 20–25 | 20–25 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 81,600 mi | 73,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Mazda 626 | Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 160 | 70 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 18 | 3 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 14 | 1 |
| Suspension | 10 | 4 |
| Air Bags | 9 | 3 |
| Electrical System | 7 | 4 |
| Equipment | 9 | 1 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 6 | 1 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 18 | 7 |
| Hesitation / surging | 14 | 0 |
| Shifting problems | 12 | 8 |
| Overheating | 11 | 6 |
| Check engine light | 7 | 0 |
| Loss of power | 6 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 6 | 0 |
2000 Mazda 626
2002 Mazda 626
Compare all Mazda 626 vs Mazda 626 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.