2000 Ford Mustang vs 2000 Toyota Celica
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Ford Mustang | 2000 Toyota Celica |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 311 | 106 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 2 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 139 | 96 |
| Investigations | 1 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 56 | 13 |
| Fire reports | 9 | 2 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 14–21 | 23–27 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 64,850 mi | 69,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Mustang | Toyota Celica |
|---|---|---|
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 34 | 41 |
| Power Train | 40 | 20 |
| Air Bags | 42 | 9 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 40 | 4 |
| Seat Belts | 36 | 4 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 19 | 11 |
| Parking Brake | 26 | 0 |
| Structure | 18 | 6 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 19 | 8 |
| Rust / corrosion | 13 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 10 | 0 |
| Clunking / rattling | 9 | 6 |
| Brake problems | 8 | 0 |
| Oil consumption | 0 | 5 |
2000 Ford Mustang
2000 Toyota Celica
Compare all Ford Mustang vs Toyota Celica years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.