2000 Ford Expedition vs 2000 Isuzu Rodeo
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Ford Expedition | 2000 Isuzu Rodeo |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 890 | 274 |
| Recall campaigns | 7 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 206 | 77 |
| Investigations | 5 | 2 |
| Crash reports | 55 | 23 |
| Fire reports | 199 | 7 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 13–15 | 16–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 91,000 mi | 90,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Expedition | Isuzu Rodeo |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical System | 214 | 15 |
| Tires | 172 | 6 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 116 | 37 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 124 | 14 |
| Structure | 47 | 84 |
| Suspension | 63 | 65 |
| Visibility | 67 | 3 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 26 | 35 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 46 | 29 |
| Rust / corrosion | 33 | 80 |
| Vibration / shaking | 21 | 13 |
| Water leaks | 17 | 0 |
| Electrical failures | 16 | 0 |
| Clunking / rattling | 14 | 0 |
| Hesitation / surging | 10 | 0 |
| Airbag warning light | 9 | 0 |
2000 Ford Expedition
2000 Isuzu Rodeo
Compare all Ford Expedition vs Isuzu Rodeo years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.