2000 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 vs 2000 Ford Expedition
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 | 2000 Ford Expedition |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 67 | 890 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 7 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 57 | 206 |
| Investigations | 0 | 5 |
| Crash reports | 4 | 55 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 199 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 13–14 | 13–15 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 119,000 mi | 91,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Suburban 1500 | Ford Expedition |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical System | 1 | 214 |
| Tires | 3 | 172 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 0 | 124 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 1 | 116 |
| Visibility | 1 | 67 |
| Suspension | 0 | 63 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 23 | 26 |
| Structure | 0 | 47 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 29 | 33 |
| Brake problems | 14 | 0 |
| Stalling | 0 | 46 |
| Vibration / shaking | 0 | 21 |
| Water leaks | 0 | 17 |
| Electrical failures | 0 | 16 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 14 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 10 |
2000 Chevrolet Suburban 1500
2000 Ford Expedition
Compare all Chevrolet Suburban 1500 vs Ford Expedition years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.