2000 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 vs 2000 Ford Ranger
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 | 2000 Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 132 | 670 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 258 | 190 |
| Investigations | 2 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 9 | 86 |
| Fire reports | 4 | 12 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 12–15 | 15–58 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 85,500 mi | 84,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Silverado 2500 | Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Tires | 9 | 139 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 53 | 65 |
| Structure | 1 | 105 |
| Power Train | 7 | 69 |
| Suspension | 4 | 72 |
| Air Bags | 4 | 67 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 0 | 55 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 11 | 37 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 40 | 92 |
| Brake problems | 18 | 11 |
| Stalling | 7 | 19 |
| Vibration / shaking | 5 | 22 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 15 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 11 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 5 |
| Overheating | 0 | 5 |
2000 Chevrolet Silverado 2500
2000 Ford Ranger
Compare all Chevrolet Silverado 2500 vs Ford Ranger years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.