1998 Ford Taurus vs 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1998 Ford Taurus | 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 545 | 27 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 191 | 51 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 61 | 1 |
| Fire reports | 14 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–20 | 18 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 88,500 mi | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Taurus | Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Speed Control | 111 | 3 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 74 | 3 |
| Power Train | 69 | 0 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 62 | 1 |
| Suspension | 59 | 0 |
| Steering | 40 | 1 |
| Air Bags | 39 | 0 |
| Electrical System | 34 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 19 | 0 |
| Hesitation / surging | 19 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 19 | 0 |
| Rust / corrosion | 16 | 0 |
| Brake problems | 13 | 0 |
| Clunking / rattling | 6 | 0 |
| Steering problems | 5 | 0 |
1998 Ford Taurus
1998 Mitsubishi Diamante
Compare all Ford Taurus vs Mitsubishi Diamante years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.