1998 Ford Contour vs 1998 Mitsubishi Galant
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1998 Ford Contour | 1998 Mitsubishi Galant |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 846 | 53 |
| Recall campaigns | 4 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 253 | 34 |
| Investigations | 7 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 50 | 3 |
| Fire reports | 20 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 21–25 | 22–23 |
| Median reported mileage | 85,000 mi | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Contour | Mitsubishi Galant |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 128 | 12 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 132 | 4 |
| Electrical System | 130 | 6 |
| Suspension | 102 | 8 |
| Air Bags | 99 | 2 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 83 | 12 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 62 | 0 |
| Visibility | 43 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 64 | 0 |
| Airbag warning light | 41 | 0 |
| Electrical failures | 35 | 0 |
| Check engine light | 22 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 21 | 0 |
| Overheating | 17 | 0 |
| Shifting problems | 14 | 0 |
| Rust / corrosion | 12 | 0 |
1998 Ford Contour
1998 Mitsubishi Galant
Compare all Ford Contour vs Mitsubishi Galant years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.