1997 Ford Taurus vs 1997 Mitsubishi Diamante
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1997 Ford Taurus | 1997 Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 770 | 34 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 251 | 56 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 64 | 2 |
| Fire reports | 12 | 1 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 19–21 | 19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 85,000 mi | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Taurus | Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 214 | 10 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 145 | 4 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 67 | 13 |
| Electrical System | 62 | 2 |
| Steering | 59 | 1 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 58 | 2 |
| Visibility | 57 | 3 |
| Air Bags | 42 | 0 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 48 | 0 |
| Rust / corrosion | 33 | 0 |
| Shifting problems | 20 | 0 |
| Overheating | 20 | 0 |
| Loss of power | 19 | 0 |
| Hesitation / surging | 18 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 17 | 0 |
| Steering problems | 14 | 0 |
1997 Ford Taurus
1997 Mitsubishi Diamante
Compare all Ford Taurus vs Mitsubishi Diamante years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.