1996 Ford Taurus vs 1996 Mazda 626
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1996 Ford Taurus | 1996 Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 825 | 359 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 281 | 44 |
| Investigations | 0 | 4 |
| Crash reports | 69 | 35 |
| Fire reports | 12 | 2 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 20–21 | 20–26 |
| Median reported mileage | 95,000 mi | 95,500 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Taurus | Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 182 | 239 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 214 | 33 |
| Steering | 101 | 7 |
| Air Bags | 45 | 49 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 66 | 11 |
| Electrical System | 57 | 12 |
| Suspension | 60 | 8 |
| Visibility | 55 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 68 | 15 |
| Rust / corrosion | 39 | 0 |
| Overheating | 33 | 9 |
| Vibration / shaking | 29 | 8 |
| Steering problems | 16 | 0 |
| Loss of power | 13 | 0 |
| Check engine light | 13 | 15 |
| Hesitation / surging | 12 | 7 |
1996 Ford Taurus
1996 Mazda 626
Compare all Ford Taurus vs Mazda 626 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.