1996 Chrysler Sebring Convertible vs 1996 Mazda 626
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1996 Chrysler Sebring Convertible | 1996 Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 68 | 359 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 38 | 44 |
| Investigations | 1 | 4 |
| Crash reports | 6 | 35 |
| Fire reports | 3 | 2 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 21 | 20–26 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 80,000 mi | 95,500 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chrysler Sebring Convertible | Mazda 626 |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 8 | 239 |
| Air Bags | 3 | 49 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 3 | 33 |
| Electrical System | 14 | 12 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 10 | 9 |
| Suspension | 8 | 8 |
| Seat Belts | 7 | 8 |
| Steering | 7 | 7 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 6 | 15 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 15 |
| Shifting problems | 0 | 12 |
| Overheating | 0 | 9 |
| Vibration / shaking | 0 | 8 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 7 |
1996 Chrysler Sebring Convertible
1996 Mazda 626
Compare all Chrysler Sebring Convertible vs Mazda 626 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.