1996 Chevrolet Camaro vs 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 116 | 25 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 52 | 39 |
| Investigations | 2 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 23 | 1 |
| Fire reports | 6 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–20 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Camaro | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 19 | 11 |
| Air Bags | 18 | 0 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 17 | 0 |
| Seat Belts | 7 | 10 |
| Electrical System | 15 | 0 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 15 | 0 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 11 | 0 |
| Visibility | 9 | 0 |
1996 Chevrolet Camaro
1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Chevrolet Camaro vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.