1992 Mitsubishi Galant vs 1992 Pontiac Grand AM
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1992 Mitsubishi Galant | 1992 Pontiac Grand AM |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 39 | 168 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 10 | 20 |
| Investigations | 2 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 1 | 12 |
| Fire reports | 2 | 4 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 19–23 | 20–26 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Mitsubishi Galant | Pontiac Grand AM |
|---|---|---|
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 4 | 62 |
| Power Train | 23 | 16 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 2 | 33 |
| Electrical System | 4 | 28 |
| Steering | 1 | 14 |
| Structure | 0 | 15 |
| Visibility | 0 | 14 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 2 | 7 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 0 | 10 |
| Brake problems | 0 | 7 |
| Overheating | 0 | 6 |
| Rust / corrosion | 0 | 6 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 5 |
1992 Mitsubishi Galant
1992 Pontiac Grand AM
Compare all Mitsubishi Galant vs Pontiac Grand AM years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.