1992 Mitsubishi Diamante vs 1992 Pontiac Grand AM
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1992 Mitsubishi Diamante | 1992 Pontiac Grand AM |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 42 | 168 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 14 | 20 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 1 | 12 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 4 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–19 | 20–26 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Mitsubishi Diamante | Pontiac Grand AM |
|---|---|---|
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 11 | 62 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 7 | 33 |
| Electrical System | 6 | 28 |
| Power Train | 4 | 16 |
| Visibility | 4 | 14 |
| Steering | 2 | 14 |
| Structure | 1 | 15 |
| Suspension | 5 | 8 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 0 | 10 |
| Brake problems | 0 | 7 |
| Overheating | 0 | 6 |
| Rust / corrosion | 0 | 6 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 5 |
1992 Mitsubishi Diamante
1992 Pontiac Grand AM
Compare all Mitsubishi Diamante vs Pontiac Grand AM years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.