1992 Chevrolet Camaro vs 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1992 Chevrolet Camaro | 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 88 | 115 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 3 | 22 |
| Investigations | 1 | 2 |
| Crash reports | 14 | 3 |
| Fire reports | 3 | 1 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–19 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | 90,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Camaro | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 4 | 72 |
| Seat Belts | 5 | 28 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 21 | 1 |
| Air Bags | 18 | 1 |
| Structure | 9 | 0 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 7 | 2 |
| Electrical System | 6 | 2 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 5 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 5 | 0 |
1992 Chevrolet Camaro
1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Chevrolet Camaro vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.