1986 Chrysler Lebaron vs 1986 Ford Taurus
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1986 Chrysler Lebaron | 1986 Ford Taurus |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 25 | 101 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 10 | 44 |
| Investigations | 4 | 8 |
| Crash reports | 4 | 2 |
| Fire reports | 5 | 6 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 19–22 | 19–23 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chrysler Lebaron | Ford Taurus |
|---|---|---|
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 7 | 22 |
| Electrical System | 5 | 18 |
| Power Train | 3 | 19 |
| Structure | 3 | 17 |
| Steering | 3 | 9 |
| Seat Belts | 1 | 8 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 1 | 7 |
| Visibility | 1 | 6 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 0 | 8 |
1986 Chrysler Lebaron
1986 Ford Taurus
Compare all Chrysler Lebaron vs Ford Taurus years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.